LeadHound
Nashville, TN · free samples, all 50 states →
Land-use decisions, from the source
10,334 rezonings, site plans, subdivisions, annexations and special-use permits recorded in the US last quarter — 1 June to 3 September 2026

Your next project is already on somebody’s agenda.

We track 8,276 local governments across the US and Canada and re-read 6,595 of them in the last seven days, pulling out every land-use action. You get the jurisdiction, the date, the body, and the board’s own words — with a link to the document it came from. Last quarter’s rows came from 2,691 different US jurisdictions across all 50 states.

2,691jurisdictions that produced a row last quarter
2,072decided — read from the minutes, after the vote
8,262scheduled — read from the agenda, before the vote
100%rows linked to a source document
Actual rows — not a mock-up

This is the product.

StageDateJurisdictionParcelWhat the board did
Decided2026-08-26Newington, CT180 Carr AvenueCommission denies rezoning of 180 Carr Avenue from residential to industrial
Decided2026-08-26West Allis, WI6022 W. National AvePlan Commission approves conditional use permits for auto repair and childcare
Decided2026-08-24Contra Costa County, CA1125 North Gate RoadZoning Administrator approves 19-lot subdivision with affordable units
Decided2026-08-18Georgetown, TX205 E. University AvenueCommission approves new Unified Development Code and PUD rezoning
Scheduled2026-08-11Brownwood, TX2305 Coggin AvenueCouncil to hold hearings on three rezoning requests
Scheduled2026-07-23Kaysville, UT1800 South Sunset DrivePlanning Commission recommends rezoning 16.2 acres near Sunset Drive to R-1-14

Six real rows from last quarter’s file, each checked against its own source document. Every row carries the verbatim sentence the board wrote and a link to the agenda or minutes it came from, so if a row is wrong you can see that for yourself in about ten seconds. We would rather you caught one than trusted us.

Why it exists

Nobody can read eight thousand agendas.

01

Before the vote, not after the permit

8,262 of last quarter’s 10,334 rows were scheduled items — on an agenda, not yet decided. An agenda is published days before its meeting; a decision reaches us a median of 30 days after one, because that is how long a clerk takes to post minutes.

02

Denials are signal too

A rezoning denied in the town next door tells you as much as one approved. Permit data only ever shows you what got built.

03

Small jurisdictions, not just metros

Most coverage stops at big cities. Last quarter’s heaviest states were Utah (1,336 rows), Texas (782), Massachusetts (555), Florida (509) and Wisconsin (421) — a lot of that is counties, towns and villages, where nobody else is looking.

What this does not do

The limits, up front.

  • We do not give you the owner’s phone number. This is the decision record, not a contact database. Owner lookup is available in selected states as an add-on, and we will tell you plainly whether yours is one.
  • The address column is roughly 70% right, and we will not pretend otherwise. 42% of rows carry a street address at all; of 40 that we hand-checked against their own documents, 12 pointed somewhere wrong — usually the meeting venue, the applicant’s or engineer’s office, or a neighbouring item on the same long agenda. So every address ships with the verbatim sentence it was pulled from, and you should read that sentence before you drive anywhere. Jurisdiction, date, body, action and source link are the reliable columns; the address is a hint.
  • Coverage is not uniform and not complete. We track 8,276 local governments (7,804 of them in the US) and re-read 6,595 in a given week. 2,691 produced a land-use row last quarter. If your county is not covered we will tell you that before you pay, not after.
  • We only see what a board writes down. An item titled “Old Business, Item 7” is invisible to us, and a project that never needs a hearing — an inline tenant fit-out, a by-right build — never appears at all.
  • “Scheduled” is not “approved”. Every row is labelled with which it is. We will never let an agenda item read as a decision.
  • Coverage is a moving target. Governments change agenda vendors and break their own feeds. We publish which jurisdictions we are reading and when each was last successfully read.
Pricing

Priced for a business-development desk, not a data budget.

Single market

$199 / month
  • One metro, county or state
  • Weekly email, CSV attached
  • Decided and scheduled items
  • Source link on every row

Regional

$499 / month
  • Up to five states
  • Weekly email plus raw CSV feed
  • Keyword and use-type filters
  • Owner lookup where available

Ask

Talk to us
  • National coverage
  • API or direct database delivery
  • Custom use-type definitions
  • Historical backfill
No card, no call, no email address

Take your state’s file right now.

Fifty states, the last 100 decisions in each, as a table and as a CSV. Nothing is gated and nothing is asked for. If it does not show you something you did not already know, that is the end of it.

Open the free samples

Or write to jacob@leadhoundtn.com about a market, a use type or a delivery format that is not covered.